Ninja H2 banner

1 - 7 of 7 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
144 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
Kawasaki released a teaser profile shot of the H2, while nice with a little bit of alteration it paints an even better picture...




Courtesy of Asphalt and Rubber.

Ostensibly from the look of the rear tire it would seem the H2 will offer ZX-14 esque performance in a ZX-10 sized package. That rear aspect certainly screams LITER to me...
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
554 Posts
What a fatty! :D From this photo H2 actually looks closer to ZX-6R size than ZX-10R or ZX14R sized as some have suggested...
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
554 Posts
Another Look at the H2, Liter Sized I would Say...

 
  • Like
Reactions: kawi_fan and tom#75

·
Registered
Joined
·
40 Posts
Sure seems like it might have the proportions consistent with a liter, i hope it is. It would be killer to have a liter with a supercharger.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
39 Posts
While I believe it will be a liter, how can you guys say that it will be - based on proportions?

After all, first gen zx10 was smaller than the 6, lol. and the current 10 is smaller in some measurements.

...................zx10r..... zx6r..... zx14r
seat height 32.0" .....32.7...... 31.5
Length ......81.7" .....82.1 ......85.4
Width .......28.1" .....27.8 ......30.3
Height ......43.9" .....43.9 ......46.1

So, you guys are telling me you can tell the difference based on a tiny video of the actual bike going by in a blur? or a 6"x6" picture on a computer screen - that's funny. ;) .

take this post with a grain of salt, I'm not trying to be an ass. Just trying to look at it a different way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McCarthy

·
Registered
Joined
·
65 Posts
While I believe it will be a liter, how can you guys say that it will be - based on proportions?

After all, first gen zx10 was smaller than the 6, lol. and the current 10 is smaller in some measurements.

...................zx10r..... zx6r..... zx14r
seat height 32.0" .....32.7...... 31.5
Length ......81.7" .....82.1 ......85.4
Width .......28.1" .....27.8 ......30.3
Height ......43.9" .....43.9 ......46.1

So, you guys are telling me you can tell the difference based on a tiny video of the actual bike going by in a blur? or a 6"x6" picture on a computer screen - that's funny. ;) .

take this post with a grain of salt, I'm not trying to be an ass. Just trying to look at it a different way.

Good points.


I usually try and make out a 1000cc bike at the 190/200 rear tire, wider engine/fairings, beefier swing arm and smaller rear sprocket.


In this case I swear its a 200 rear. The outline and length excludes a Hyper (bike is too short) and 300 HP out of a blown 600 or 750 would be a reliability issue, hence a 1000cc.
 
1 - 7 of 7 Posts
Top